<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia&#8217;s mixed reactions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.valleyprblog.com/social-media/wikipedias-mixed-reactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.valleyprblog.com/social-media/wikipedias-mixed-reactions/</link>
	<description>A (dry heated) group blog from Phoenix, Arizona on public relations, marketing and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:24:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://www.valleyprblog.com/social-media/wikipedias-mixed-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-1326</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 23:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valleyprblog.com/?p=904#comment-1326</guid>
		<description>I came across an interesting bit of research from Pew Internet &amp; American Life. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wikipedia07.pdf
Wikipedia users tend to be younger and more educated. That was in April last year, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across an interesting bit of research from Pew Internet &amp; American Life. <a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wikipedia07.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wikipedia07.pdf</a><br />
Wikipedia users tend to be younger and more educated. That was in April last year, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taran Rampersad</title>
		<link>http://www.valleyprblog.com/social-media/wikipedias-mixed-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-1328</link>
		<dc:creator>Taran Rampersad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valleyprblog.com/?p=904#comment-1328</guid>
		<description>It was my first time traipsing through there. My initial impression is that most of the discussion is well balanced, and it seems to be balanced by the select few.

It is interesting, especially for someone who stopped editing the Wikipedia- especially the reactions to Wikipedia criticisms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was my first time traipsing through there. My initial impression is that most of the discussion is well balanced, and it seems to be balanced by the select few.</p>
<p>It is interesting, especially for someone who stopped editing the Wikipedia- especially the reactions to Wikipedia criticisms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.valleyprblog.com/social-media/wikipedias-mixed-reactions/comment-page-1/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.valleyprblog.com/?p=904#comment-1327</guid>
		<description>Well it isn&#039;t terribly surprising. I mean, Wikipedia is open to anyone who wants to write for it, or worse, edit it. So it is made up of the average intelligence. Since the average person isn&#039;t a research scientist, journalist, professor or author... how great can the everyman quality of Wikipedia really be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it isn&#8217;t terribly surprising. I mean, Wikipedia is open to anyone who wants to write for it, or worse, edit it. So it is made up of the average intelligence. Since the average person isn&#8217;t a research scientist, journalist, professor or author&#8230; how great can the everyman quality of Wikipedia really be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
