Wikipedia’s mixed reactions
“Anyone who wants to get a sense of just what brand of fruitcakes one is dealing with in Wikipedia World should try reading the English Wikipedia Discussion List for a month or two,” retorted one reader on the news that an associate prof at the University of Texas was recommending his students read the discussion and history pages.
Do fruitcakes keep Wikipedia alive? Whenever I ask, people have mixed reactions. Mostly positive, but the people who think the open source model is flawed don’t exactly distrust Google searches and book reviews.
Or is it fashionable to slam Wikipedia? A senator introduced a bill to ban it last year. There was a professor who had banned students from using it, but (as TechCrunch pointed out) had her own Wiki entry. Yes the senator, too, has a wiki entry.
Closer to home, ever peeked behind the curtain and checked the discussion pages of Scottsdale on Wikipedia? Much more contentious than what goes on behind Tempe’s Wiki entry, except for one deletion of a “ghetto-rific suburb” reference.
Wikipedia’s mixed reactions
Add your Comment
Want Your Picture Icon? Go to gravatar.com and set a picture up to your email address for free. It also works on thousands of other websites, too!
Categories
Recent Comments
That MBA is REALLY paying off for Mr. Wool....
Linda, thanks for the informative book review. This...
Thanks for the shout out, Len. My “great product...
As newsrooms dwindle in size and reporters pickup more...
While he may not be directly pitching to the press,...
Blogroll
- Acme Photography
- Brain Matter
- Brian Shaler
- Convince & Convert
- Cut Me Some Flack
- Espresso Pundit
- HMA Time
- Hoi Polloi Report
- It's About The Work
- Linda VandeVrede
- Liquis Design Blog
- Mighty Interactive
- Off Madison Ave
- Park & Co.
- Park Howell
- PR Advice
- Random Tuesday Morning Ramblings
- SoCal PR Blog
- Stealthmode Blog
- Take Three
- tdhurst
- Team Forty
- The Marketing Journalist
- The One to Go To
- The PR Practitioner
- The Right Point
- Think Fast
- What I DO Know is…
Comments
February 15th, 2008 at 10:30 am
Well it isn’t terribly surprising. I mean, Wikipedia is open to anyone who wants to write for it, or worse, edit it. So it is made up of the average intelligence. Since the average person isn’t a research scientist, journalist, professor or author… how great can the everyman quality of Wikipedia really be?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
It was my first time traipsing through there. My initial impression is that most of the discussion is well balanced, and it seems to be balanced by the select few.
It is interesting, especially for someone who stopped editing the Wikipedia- especially the reactions to Wikipedia criticisms.
February 15th, 2008 at 4:41 pm
I came across an interesting bit of research from Pew Internet & American Life. http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Wikipedia07.pdf
Wikipedia users tend to be younger and more educated. That was in April last year, though.