Who needs a widget? You do!
Let’s face it. The things that are supposed to make our lives easy continue to befuddle us: trackbacks, podzines, twebinar, RSS. The widget, however, is easier to like.
Yahoo! has this really neat ‘Typing Speedometer‘ widget that you never knew you needed –until now! Wikipedia has a cool widget, many blogs are littered with widgets, and Facebook users hit on you with widgets until you want to reach for the pepper spray. One day you’re gonna bump into one so before someone gets hurt (I spotted two attack widgets) get to know how to use a few of them. You could always get the Dummies book on widgets, but here are some useful places to start:
- PRSA web site has a primer on widgets.
- There are Google ‘Gadgets‘ that are sort of widgets. Want to dig deeper, read this –with caution.
- Try out a widget or two on your desktop -no programming required.
- If you have a blog, there are the top 50.
Add your Comment
Want Your Picture Icon? Go to gravatar.com and set a picture up to your email address for free. It also works on thousands of other websites, too!
Categories
Recent Comments
Starbucks has just done a deal with Foursquare to provide rewards...
I enter business card information into my...
It was so wonderful to see the Valley’s...
Thank you for the mention. Media Watch AZ does what it...
The media is on it – 24 hours a day – it is covering some...
Blogroll
- Acme Photography
- Brain Matter
- Brian Shaler
- Convince & Convert
- Cut Me Some Flack
- Espresso Pundit
- HMA Time
- Hoi Polloi Report
- Linda VandeVrede
- Mighty Interactive
- Off Madison Ave
- Park & Co.
- Park Howell
- PR Advice
- Random Tuesday Morning Ramblings
- SoCal PR Blog
- Stealthmode Blog
- Take Three
- tdhurst
- Team Forty
- The Marketing Journalist
- The One to Go To
- The PR Practitioner
- Think Fast
- What I DO Know is…






Comments
July 8th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
Although I applaud the development of gadgets that may (or may not) make our electronic lives easier, I have to put a naysay to the use of the term ‘widget.’ I suppose this is a losing battle by now, but why has this perfectly good term, meaning “an unnamed or hypothetical manufactured article” been co-opted when there’s a perfectly good term, ‘gadget’ already in place for what it really does?
Actually, we probably need a neologism for this new concept…perhaps ‘e-gadge’ or ‘webgadge’?
Call me a fuddy duddy (if you dare) but writers and word lovers must lament every time a useful distinction — such as the difference between ‘disinterested’ (having no stake in the outcome) and ‘uninterested.’ (not giving a rat’s patoot about the outcome)– goes by the wayside thanks to the uncaring and barbaric
whim of the tin-eared ignorantia.