What’s Conservapedia up to?

By Angelo Fernando on March 20th, 2007 In Social Media

Take a look at the so-called alternative to Wikipedia, Conservapedia. I wrote about this yesterday.

Easy to see what it stands for, just from the title. But between the inane entries (supposed to be “clean and concise”) it’s there may be another agenda, and their effort to counter the supposed bias of Wikipedia. Someone from the McCain’s campaign ought to be watching the listing for him. Especially the topic of ‘Electability‘ and the slanted entries about his age, trustworthness, and ‘questionable conduct. (their quotes, by the way). Electability, for instance, is not an entry for say Giuliani.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.

Add your Comment


Want Your Picture Icon? Go to gravatar.com and set a picture up to your email address for free. It also works on thousands of other websites, too!

Blog Categories

Recent Blog Comments:

As a past employee of General Motors, I can honestly say that...

From Jackie Wright on Maybe they were hybrid jets

As a commentator on Ragan’s site noted, it’s not...

From Jim Veihdeffer on Maybe they were hybrid jets

PR reflects operations - this shouldn’t have been a surprise.

From Dan Wool on Maybe they were hybrid jets

Follow your thought: The U.S. automaker execs should personally...

From Mike Padgett on Maybe they were hybrid jets

Hmmmmm…. friend protocols… for me...

From Roger DeWitt on Breaking news: I have 300 ‘friends’