Larry King and Carrie Prejean – what a mess of an interview!

By Linda VandeVrede on November 13th, 2009 In Hype!, Media

Did you see the Larry King interview of Carrie Prejean this week?   I squirm for both the interviewer and the interviewee everytime I watch it.   Here’s the clip from YouTube.  Ouch.   Bad ju-ju on both sides.  

Didn’t see it?   Larry asked Carrie (former Miss USA contestant and Miss California who became famous for her anti- gay marriage comment) about the terms of the settlement.   What followed was a truly bizarre example of bad responses on both Larry’s part and Carrie’s part.   Carrie was acting like a petulant teenager and taking her mike off, to leave the show, and Larry was doggedly persisting with his line of questioning.   Hello?  

I asked local media training expert Kathy Kerchner what her opinion was of the clip.

Carrie Prejean went on Larry King’s show simply to push her new book (”Still Standing”). Unfortunately, the man who usually rolls over for celebrities turned into Chris Matthews and began throwing hardballs.

Carrie was right to not answer King’s questions about her settlement, but she did it “inappropriately.” Instead of continuing to label his questions in that wimpy way, after the second or third time he asked, she should have bluntly stated, “Larry, no matter how many times you ask that question I’m not going to answer it and I can’t answer it because of legal issues. If you have any other things you’d like to talk about, that would be great. Otherwise, we might as well end the interview now.”

I read some reports that she also had an agreement that King would not take any phone calls during her interview and that was what she was really upset about. If that was the case, once he took the call, she should have said, “Larry, I apologize to your caller, but as you know we agreed before the show that we wouldn’t have any outside questions so we could focus on the issues I discussed in my book.”

I asked another media training pro his opinion of the incident, and here’s his response, to give the male perspective:

I’m almost speechless.  That thing bears no resemblance to any real world scenario to which I can relate.  And then my mind jumps quickly to the bottom line of the event; namely, that Carrie Prejean (or maybe it’s her publicist) is far more powerful than Larry King.

Both sides were completely unprofessional from the start.  And I can’t imagine advising any client to put him or herself in either situation.

Given his power and worldwide reach, I don’t see why Larry would agree to not take callers.  But it’s even worse that his staff did, didn’t tell him, AND THEN allowed a caller to actually get on the air. 

Carrie herself would have no way to know any better, but she was trained within an inch of her credibility.  On second thought, beyond it.  Gracefully decline to answer specific questions under court order?  Yes.  Use a court order as a nonsensical excuse to dodge any question you don’t like or, as in this case, don’t understand?  Never.  In fact, avoiding even the appearance of the latter is the whole point of the original media training.  And is now more important than ever, with so much of the latter political-style advice out there. 

The two ironies are:  (1) I’m sure the publicist is high-fiving everyone about how they “showed” Larry, while everyone who saw it actually thinks the publicist’s client is an idiot (not true, but that’s the unmistakable impression which was inexplicably created on purpose), and (2) I suspect Larry and Carrie would have had a far more interesting conversation left to their own devices.

Linda here again.  So far this year, I haven’t been real impressed with the ability of any beauty queen to handle herself in interviews.   I’m thinking Miss Teen USA 2007/Miss South Carolina (”such as”), Sarah Palin (”you betcha”), and now Carrie “(inappropriate”).   Are we asking too much of our “beautiful people” if we want them to handle themselves on air like an experienced politician, in addition to being able to be poised while walking on stilt-like heels?  Any beauty queens, current or former, care to enlighten me?   I’m no beauty queen, and I have high school pictures to prove it.

Larry King and Carrie Prejean – what a mess of an interview!

Comments

arizonanews Says:
November 14th, 2009 at 1:34 am

“Are we asking too much of our “beautiful people” if we want them to handle themselves on air like an experienced politician,”

No. We didn’t ask Carrie to do anything except shut up and go away. She thrust herself back in the spotlight by having a book published in her name. If she wants to use a book to get rich, fine, but she should get the same critical questions from journalists that any politician or public figure would face.

Jackie Wright Says:
November 15th, 2009 at 7:37 pm

AMEN! I can’t tell you how many times I have seen awful interviews with people who should know better! The clue bus is honking! If you are a person in the public eye, hire a PR professional NOT A PUBLICIST, to walk you through a real media training program and don’t even think about speaking on camera before you have your talking points memorized!

Steven Groves Says:
November 16th, 2009 at 4:59 pm

Wow – it was painful… Carrie must be as ‘blonde’ as she looks. Being a blonde man, she give us all a bad name – well, she give us all as humans a bad name when she behaves like that.

Tim Wheatcroft Says:
November 16th, 2009 at 5:04 pm

I think that her publicists were negligent in the way they advised their client.

Irrespective of Larry’s performance, they put their client in the spotlight even though she was woefully unprepared or ill-equipped to do so.

Either a) they knew that and sent her out anyway, in which case they did a terrible job or b) they couldn’t see that, in which case they did a terrible job.

Linda VandeVrede Says:
November 17th, 2009 at 12:11 pm

It was just bad all around. To your point, Tim, her publicists should have prepared her better for all types of scenarios. And Larry King, as the consummate interviewer, should have recognized her discomfort and inexperience and smoothly left the topic alone. But he persisted, and it just got weirder and weirder.

Kevin Curran Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 6:56 pm

I have either interviewed or attended news conferences with Miss America winners several times. I have always found them to be well-spoken and patient.

The first LDS Miss America politely dodged a question about polygamy during a press event. One former Miss America apologized that she couldn’t show me her crown, she’d moved on from pageant life and it was at her mother’s house. Vanessa Williams even kept her cool during her resignation news conference (at which my poor wife almost got trampled).

Keep in mind these are Miss America winners, a pageant where looks are supposedly equal with other attributes. Carrie was in the Miss USA stable, which has different judging criterea.

Linda VandeVrede Says:
November 18th, 2009 at 9:19 pm

Good point, Kevin – they are 2 different pageants. I wish wiki answers had a better or longer explanation however:

“The shortest answer to this question [what is the difference between Miss America and Miss USA] is that it’s really like the difference between Nike & Puma…just two different brands, but both running shoes. Both pageants have long and varied histories, but Miss USA goes on to Miss Universe and is a Trump owned organization. Miss America is not a part of Trump.

The differences in the competition is that Miss America has a talent portion. Usually Miss USA will be a little more glam and Miss America is a little more ‘woman next door’.”

Add your Comment


Want Your Picture Icon? Go to gravatar.com and set a picture up to your email address for free. It also works on thousands of other websites, too!