GoDaddy’s Super Bowl ad play – shrewd or stale?
If the same”controversial” story comes back every single year, does it constitute news?
GoDaddy’s much anticipated (um, predictable) story of having several Super Bowl ads rejected strikes me as a way of proving (a) how desperate the media has to be to bite a story like this, or (b) how shrewdly they positioned this, knowing it would be deja vu to the media.
Consider these stories:
- Cleaner ad to air during Super Bowl – Jan 2008
- GoDaddy Beats Censors – Feb 2006
- GoDaddy ad stalled by censors: Dec 2005
Not hard to predict this approach, but at which point does it become old? AdRants suggests it may be a play to get people to go watch the so-called banned spots that were never intentioned to run during Super Bowl. One reader rightly commented on the story at AZCentral that “journalists are such tools.”
Are they?
GoDaddy’s Super Bowl ad play – shrewd or stale?
Add your Comment
Want Your Picture Icon? Go to gravatar.com and set a picture up to your email address for free. It also works on thousands of other websites, too!
Categories
Recent Comments
I actually like local radio...
Another point in support of radio –...
This is an outstanding...
According to Arbitron, since...
Kristina – you’re right. David Meerman Scott’s...
Blogroll
- Acme Photography
- Brain Matter
- Brian Shaler
- Convince & Convert
- Cut Me Some Flack
- Espresso Pundit
- HMA Time
- Hoi Polloi Report
- Linda VandeVrede
- Mighty Interactive
- Off Madison Ave
- Park & Co.
- Park Howell
- PR Advice
- Random Tuesday Morning Ramblings
- SoCal PR Blog
- Stealthmode Blog
- Take Three
- tdhurst
- Team Forty
- The Marketing Journalist
- The One to Go To
- The PR Practitioner
- Think Fast
- What I DO Know is…
Comments
January 26th, 2008 at 10:27 am
The tactic is played out. It’s an eye-roller. The first year, it worked great, because it probably wasn’t intentional. In the second year, an encore — after millions of dollars of free international press — was understandable.
Now it’s just silly. They deliberately game the ad to fail the censors and appeal to everyone due to reverse psychology. But when the hype is manufactured and we then watch the end result on Super Bowl (oops – “Big Game”) Sunday and wonder “Is that it?”…it doesn’t help their branding. Meanwhile, Go Daddy has lined up great celebrity endorsements (Chad Johnson, Amanda Beard, etc.) and can’t figure out how to use them any other way.
February 4th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
We just posted our 4th annual study of how well super bowl advertisers integrated online and offline advertising – we’ll be writing more about this on our blog, but the preliminary findings are already up on our site: Super Bowl XLII Scorecard.
The Great Go Daddy Debate: Go Brand or Go Home(page)? | Valley PR Blog Says:
February 7th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
[...] with this year’s ad, Go Daddy proved what we’ve been saying all along: its advertising strategy is eroding its brand equity. Go Daddy is becoming “the brand that [...]